Amol G Mitra v. Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai allowed the interim application for condoning delay in filing a reply, subject to payment of costs to the Bar Association.
What did the court decide?
Condonation of delay in filing reply allowed; ₹2,000 cost directed to be paid to D.R.T. Bar Association.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 340/2023 In
Misc. Appeal No. 13/2023
Between
Amol G Mitra … Appellant/s V/s.
Bank of India …Respondent/s
Ms Sonali Jain, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr C. P. Ravindranath Menon, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
-: Order dated: 06/06/2023:-
I.A. No. 340/2023 is an application for condoning the delay in filing a reply.
The application has been opposed and the reply has been filed stating that the reason stated for not filing the reply is not acceptable. After having heard both sides. I find that I.A. No. 340/2023 is to be allowed subject to the payment of a cost of ₹2000/- to the D.R.T. Bar Association, Mumbai for the purchase of books and periodicals within a week.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing reply to the respondent's affidavit be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Amol G Mitra
- respondent
Bank of India
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court