Asset Reconstruction Company India Ltd. v. Kundil Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd.

.1

farad

debts recovery APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.

MUMBAI

Mlsc Application No. -of 20 Jo. siy/a^s C 6os>)
In
Appeal No. .of 20 by - /V-e
krufa^r, c2-C^ X/^'
... Appellants
(Advocate "i
}
Versus
fawcUb fatty
Respondents
*
(Advocate __ £ ) i
! ; | I. - —
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar’s order / Chairperson’s Orders
<Q^v- Pcnhie^
rfa
AW
4s
fT) ntfmaz
4, S7 % aiAJ^
/$/£ ■ /M&s^ ^/ Z/ &
/4^/s^-""
(^CuLr)^ ^^c/>
<'Le/A r
S&[osl2t>22>.
,!
■'2_Sl08l'2c&3
p\Av ’ RVSqbH Po?T
.
■(XJorX’e- ' - _ pe^porAcIir'4- , , ,
r pppellanH £eeJ< Vir^
f\J%/DcaJre ’Po-
sdfo 4-i W« >'C^ U fa> ^-' z 2 '
^4-eP-^ ’Fc'zr
'3 / <= ‘
\q- Z10 /-ZfcQ-a
^-ejp£. fa
My

Contd Sheet

\ Date	Office Notes, Appear and Registrar’s order / Chairp	ances erson’s Orders
0^	V2fKy23 ^/10/*2023	O 0^102 AcJv.TodTrojeel-' Fb^r f\ppd