Mr Veluthedathuparambil Kochugovindan Bharathan v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal adjourned the matter for steps to bring the legal representative of the deceased appellant on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 73/2020
In
Appeal No. 302/2013
Between
Vijaylakshmi W/o V.K. Bharthan V/s. Canara Bank
… Appellant/s …Respondent/s
Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate for Appellant. B. Shaikh, i/b Ms. Fatima Lakdawala, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 24/11/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel who was appearing for the Appellant submits that the Appellant is reported to be dead, and steps are being taken to bring the legal representative of the deceased Appellant on record.
Post on 29.12.2023 for steps.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-25
1
Vijaylakshmi W/o V.K. Bharthan
Canara Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court