This single-paragraph order dismisses an appeal after the appellant failed to comply with a direction to pay a pre-deposit. The appellant was ordered to file an application for extension.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 718/2023
Between
Bandu Pandurang Salunke … Appellant/s
V/s.
Tata Capital Financial Service Ltd. &Ors.
…Respondent/s
An Advocate for the Appellant is present.
Mr. Rajesh Nagori, i/b Mr. R.L. Motwani, Advocate for Respondents.
-: Order dated: 08/06/2023:-
The Appellant did not comply with the direction of this Tribunal to pay the 3rd instalment of pre-deposit. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that he is filing the application for an extension of time together with the application to restore the Appeal.
Application, if any, filed and found in order, shall be posted before the bench.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-10
1
Bandu Pandurang Salunke
Tata Capital Financial Service Ltd.
Mr. Justice Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
