The tribunal registrar considered the Respondent Bank's request to file a reply out of time, noting that the application will be heard after notifying the Appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 255/2023 (WoD) In
Appeal on Diary No. 648/2023
Between
Rajendra Kumar S/o Late Surendra Dua … Appellant/s V/s.
Ravi Commercial Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. …Respondent/s
Mr. Gaurang Kinkhabwala, along with Ms. Sonali Jain, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Omkar Chahal, along with Mr. Akshay Bhalerao, i/b Mr. Anup Lohiya, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 11/10/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent Bank submits that a reply is being filed with an application to receive it out of time. Any such application filed by the Respondent shall be put up for hearing after giving notice to the Counsel appearing for the Appellant.
rm-2
1
Rajendra Kumar S/o Late Surendra Dua
Ravi Commercial Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
