The Tribunal allowed the IA for condonation of delay in the appeal. The 2-day delay was condoned as the reasons provided were acceptable, and the appeal was taken on the file.
Condonation of 2-day delay in filing the appeal allowed; appeal taken on file with no defects to be cured.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 245/2022 (CoD)
In Appeal on Diary No. 544/2021
Between
Deustche Bank A G … Appellant/s V/s.
Bharat Dadaso Jain & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Kushal Ameta, i/b M/s. Goenka Law Associates, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 13/04/2023:-
I.A. No. 245/2022 which is an application for condonation of
delay in filing the Appeal.
The impugned order dated 2.11.2021. The Appeal is filed on 08.12.2021 with a delay of 2 days. Since the Respondents have not appeared despite receipt of the notice, they are called absent and set ex-parte.
The reason for the delay in filing the Appeal has been explained in the application and accompanying affidavit and it is acceptable.
The delay of 2 days stands condoned.
The Appeal shall be taken on the file, in case there are no defects to be cured.
Post on 02.05.2023 before the Registrar.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-09
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of a 2-day delay in filing an appeal was acceptable?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deustche Bank A G
Bharat Dadaso Jain & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
