Saurashtra Gramin Bank v. Ritaben Sureshbhai Gohel
Case brief
What is this about?
An appeal arising from a Debt Recovery Tribunal order imposing costs, addressed via an interim stay application. The respondent did not appear, and the matter was tabled for future hearings.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 241/2023 (Stay)
In
Appeal No. 22/2023
Between
Authorised Officer, … Appellant/s Saurashtra Gramin Bank V/s.
Ritaben Sureshbhai Gohel & Anr.
Mr. Prashant Pandit along with Mr. Jay Pandit, Advocate for Appellant.
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe filed by the Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
- Respondents have been served but none appear.
- I.A. No. 241/2023 which is an application for a stay of the impugned order. The Securitization Application (S.A.) No. 146/2020 was disposed of by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Ahmedabad vide order dated 29.03.2023 imposing the cost of ₹ 50,000/- to be paid within 15 days from the date of the order.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Saurashtra Gramin Bank
- respondent
Ritaben Sureshbhai Gohel & Anr.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court