The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed two interim applications. The first requested deletion of a deceased respondent's name, and the second sought impleadment of an Official Liquidator for a respondent company that went into liquidation.
Application to delete 3rd Respondent allowed; impleadment of Official Liquidator allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 213/2023
And
I.A. No. 214/2023 In Appeal No. 144/2016
Between
Maulik Nareshbhai Desai V/s.
Bank of Baroda & Ors
… Appellant/s
…Respondent/s
Ms. Sonali Jain, Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Nalini Loadh, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. Mohit S., Advocate for Respondent No4
-: Order dated: 11/08/2023:-
Respondent No.3 is reported to be dead and the Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant does not intend to bring on record the other legal representatives of the 3rd Respondent and no steps are intended to be taken. Hence, an application is filed to delete the name of the 3rd Respondent from the party array.
1
out necessary amendment to the appeal memorandum.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-23
2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the name of the deceased 3rd Respondent should be deleted when no legal representatives are being brought on record.
Whether the Official Liquidator appointed for the Respondent Bank must be impleaded in ongoing proceedings.
Whether the applications are allowed and amendments to the appeal memorandum are carried out.
Maulik Nareshbhai Desai
Bank of Baroda
Ors
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
