Arcil v. Shakuntala Shet
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
v
FARAD
r-.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
- MUMSAil
CcdO)
Mlsc ApplicationIn No,’ __________ 1 "of 20 I. No.
Appeal No. of 20
/^ssscZ" ^eoctfiz Go'CD ... AppolInnU
(Advocate
Versus
....Rospondonts
•
^akufAa/4 S- faA^h £
(Advooato ;j
Date Office Notes, Appearances
_______ a“d Koglgfrar'B order1/Clialrpe^son’o Orders
J'ofyZ ' ^>^>' W&n/htll'
o
lc/)e^
faD 0i&iOcl<fa ’> hot/> ' AdC-
<A) he. ^Dpr&iejjhD fMsA&f
& CtlWh
'i^' '$A*D ^os
G 3/ 0^00^3
67^l
^^4
Ar^-
flr&etrf fa-
f fa
^u. JAa^/wy
■C r&D ^umji)
v^,
-firr ‘
^e, Dt-f . A A 7-5 i ,070 ’ O'^'i *0 . '/ZefaD^^ - . Zl . JS9.is<br>0^le>&)&2^- k
......’
I P.T.O.
k
3VU{4 >p^S -vuw^pcXcA'J 32^ 'Ap^d “ ^4 u> f=U o ds ay Q Pbl ud^Ovuud^j9/^£-tuoirs-ddw J2xy h^0H?'^py "s-r <S7 J\U-^ a| setts' • - J /^si^s
8^0^/
u’dn ^}^s
s^cf-H-S o->/i»-l 04 ^>40^2-,'^ s-) -4VV|'Pc»c*xj yjg--^ U 0 ^r> "Supi ol CM } atlc^dl Fq C03G^.^ orC93 3-d ^o^n ^AJpP?r7 iN-32^^puo^X.C'c/?8-^JZ^cA -4'Z ^r,JJ 4UP|^ddtl 3^g\3 ■ v 4u?puoGisay J2,(y ^uo/xj t “(UD^pcldtl ./>,py ,-€fcj(4S?fi>£/ ' 9 I X
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court