Adjournment order in an I.A. for service of notices on unserved respondents in an appeal arising from a DRT order against a banking dispute.
Order of adjournment and direction to serve notice on remaining respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
I.A. No. 15 of 2020
In Appeal No. 199 of 2018
(Arising out of O.A. 249 of 2001 of DRT-I, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
28.03.2023 State Bank of India … Applicant -VsOriental Bank of Commerce & 3 Others … Respondents Mr. Pijush Kanti Ray with Mr. S. Bandopadhyay, Learned Counsel for Applicant Mr. Sudipto Gupta, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It appears that Respondents No. 2 to 4 are not served. Notices be served upon Respondents No. 2 to 4 and Affidavit of Service be filed within three weeks.
On the request made on behalf of Respondent No.1 the matter is adjourned for the day.
List on 13th June, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 28th March, 2023 05/ac
State Bank of India
Oriental Bank of Commerce
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
