Hans Ispat Lts v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRTA dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to comply with the Tribunal's directions to make a required pre-deposit.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 716/2022
Between
Hans Ispat Ltd & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s.
Bank of Baroda & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Rishabh Shah along with Ms. Madhavi Doshi, i/b M/s. Phoenix Legal, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Shubham Dubey, i/b Mr. Bhaskar Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.1
Ms. Mumtaz Khan, Advocate for Respondent No.2
Mr. Harsh Behany along with Mr. Gurave Gandhi, i/b M/s. H.N. Legal, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
An Advocate for Respondent No. 4 is present.
-: Order dated: 09/08/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant has not complied
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hans Ispat Ltd
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court