Gunasekaran v. Catholic Syrian Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 252/2023 in A.IR:330/2022
Gunasekaran V/S Catholic Syrian Bank Limited
27/07/2023
Appellant counsel present.
Files AOS for R1 to R4.
R1 and R3 Notice served.
R-2 and R4 Returned as insufficient Address.
Ld. Counsel Palani Kumar Ramesh undertakes to file Vakalath in respect of R1 Bank.
Ld. Counsel S. Kumar undertakes to file Vakalath for R3.
Appellant is directed to provide copy of Documents including delay petition to the counsel of R1 and R3 to enable filing counter if any on priority.
Call on 10/08/2023 for filing Vakalath of R1 and R3 and Affidavit of substituted service of R2 and R4.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gunasekaran
- respondent
Catholic Syrian Bank Limited
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 331090003302023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court