Giriraj Cotsyn Private Limited v. State Bank of India

; ^Mi»cA^iioddonNo._________o|20. Lwior r—'
7: No,. ^^ 0>,n9^ ln/A7 j
...Appellants
(Advocate £> hzX l^j|7)y .Q 1\ GeH" '
j!
Versus
:T
Rospondanto
i
(Advocate
-J
Data Office Notos, Appearancos |
and Registrar’s ordor/ Chalrporaon’o Ordoro
Appeal presented , by, $?k<* ;
Advocate for Appellant with DiCwSfe |;
- of Rs. on
being aggrieved by the Impugned order / pri^T order
passed on 6 In S.A No.?^2- of ^35^2
.u/s 2e-of-iW7D.D.a I- iLel -1993 7 18 of
by DRTrB; >
I
S.A.R.F.A.eTS.I. Act. 2002.
( Exh - 1 Appeal Memo
»
4'v 3.0. for compliance to i
REGISTIWt
ag/(0/2023 fs/orxe Astt boH> Pa'er^es.
fdefecte do 'So/ll /<2o23.
fAcJj- .pots' RemovcsJ o
I
I
b
51
17^/r ■ &€4i<-tewT.
;r
P.T.O.

|.1
’ a)>e+5i Gj^i-
s s
1 o/oi 04 ^^p=>o
JW
z 1___ . ■,s^,h-^oa
g^QbJ
sjepjQ s.uosJ6dJ|Bi|3 / jqpjo sJejjeiDoy pus
saouejeeddy *68io[J eoijjo|1(/9>
eiBQ|•
■ • ■• i-
_} _?v| |---|---|---|