M s M R Enterprises v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed the intervention application and rejected the appeal by default for failure to appear and prosecute the matter.
What did the court decide?
IA 371/2022 dismissed for default; Appeal A.IR (SA): 255/2022 rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 371/2022 in A.IR:255/2022
M.R. Enterprises &Anr V/S Bank Of Baroda
01/11/2023
No representation for Petitioners/Appellants.
This matter is posted today for dismissal as Petitioners/Appellants were absent on previous hearing i.e. 04.09.2023.
To give an opportunity to Petitioners/Appellants, matter is kept under the caption “for dismissal”. In spite of that Petitioners/Appellants evinced no interest in prosecuting the Application. Therefore, IA 371/2022 is dismissed for default. Consequently, Appeal A.IR (SA): 255/2022 is rejected. All pending IAs, if any, stand closed.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.R. Enterprises & Anr
- respondent
Bank Of Baroda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 331090002552022
- Bench
- S Ravi Kumar
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court