Elavarasan v. Idbi Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal declined the appeal for non-compliance with office objections despite sufficient opportunities given.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:750/2023
Elavarasan &Anr V/S Idbi Bank Ltd &Ors
03/11/2023
None for Appellant.
None of the Office objection are complied despite sufficient time given earlier on 21/7/2023, 8/8/2023, 21/8/2023, 30/8/2023, 22/9/2023, 3/10/2023, 12/10/2023, 13/10/2023, 26/10/2023, 31/10/2023 and today .
Neither Memo for withdrawal is submitted till date.
Since office objections have not been complied in time despite sufficient opportunity being given Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT (Procedure), Rules 1994.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Elavarasan & Anr
- respondent
Idbi Bank Ltd & Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 331090007502023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court