Duvvada Umamaheswara Rao v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar noted defects in the draft appeal under SARFAESI Act, including missing impugned order copy, improper format, and unpaid court fee, without disposing the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Regular Appeal Diary No. 224 of 2023 Date: 28/03/2023
Duvvada Umamaheswara Rao ------------Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India ------------Respondent
Received an application filed online as well as hard copy on 28/03/2023 under 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Duvvada Umamahaeswara Rao, party in person.
Application fee of Rs.200/- vide Transaction Ref. ID 2803230021441 dated 28/03/2023 has been paid through online along with the application.
On scrutiny following defects are mentioned:
- (i) Application is not in proper format.
- (ii) Impugned order is not mentioned in relief sought para of memorandum of appeal.
- (iii) Certified copy of impugned order is not filed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Duvvada Umamaheswara Rao
- respondent
State Bank of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 191090002242023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court