Dr Jose Joseph v. Icici Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Drath declined an appeal due to non-compliance with office objections within the prescribed time under DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
What did the court decide?
Appeal declined.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:864/2023
Jose Joseph V/S Icici Bank Ltd
19/12/2023
None for Appellant.
Many of the objections still pending for compliance. Accordingly, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6 (4) of the DRAT (Procedure) Rules 1994 as office objections are not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jose Joseph
- respondent
Icici Bank Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 331090008642023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court