The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal declined an appeal because office objections remained uncomplied with within a reasonable time under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
Appeal declined due to non-compliance with office objections under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:508/2023
M/S Donos Motors Pvt Ltd & Ors V/S A.O.,Karur Vysya Bank
08/08/2023
None for Appellant today.
Few objections are pending for compliance.
Accordingly, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/-
Registrar
M/S Donos Motors Pvt Ltd
A.O., Karur Vysya Bank
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
