G Deenadayalan v. Indian Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:306/2023
G.Deenadayalan & Ors V/S A.O.,Indian Bank
07/06/2023
Representing counsel Noel Raj for Appellant present.
Few objections still pending including payment of Deficit Court fee despite opportunities given previously.
Hence, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994, as objections not complied in reasonable time.
Registrar
Sd/-
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G.Deenadayalan & Ors
- respondent
A.O., Indian Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court