In this interim proceeding, the single Judge rejected the urgency application filed by the appellant. The appeal lay was dismissed without engaging with substantive precedents as it warranted only a procedural disposal.
Urgency application No. 211/2023 was rejected. Case listed for 13.04.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 1179/2022 Date: 27.03.2023
M/s M. P. Bullion Vs. Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. Present: Shri Kashif Zaidi, counsel for the appellant,
No good ground is made out in the urgency application for expediting the proceeding of the case. Accordingly, the urgency application being I.A. No. 211/2023 is rejected. Let the case be listed on the date already fixed for 13.04.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any ground is made out to expedite proceedings by urgency application.
M/s M. P. Bullion
Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
