Bank of India v. Satish Arora
Case brief
What is this about?
The Niyamito Tribunal listed and summoned the respondents to reply or appear in the criminal appeal, given their absence.
What did the court decide?
Listed for reply.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 59/2021 Date: 08.09.2023
Bank of India Vs. Satish Arora & Ors.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Supriy Mishra, counsel for the appellant,
The office report dated 06.09.2023 shows that no one appears on behalf of the respondents, although they have been served through paper publication. Let the served respondents put in appearance and file reply by the next date, failing which the matter shall be heard.
List this case on 13.12.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of India
- respondent
Satish Arora
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 091090000592021
- Topic
- Corruption
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court