Bank of Baroda v. Mukesh Jaiswal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listed for admission. A condonation of delay application contained no substantive decision within the text of the order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 268/2023 Date: 20.04.2023
Bank of Baroda Vs. Mukesh Jaiswal
Ld. Counsel Shri Avinash Jaiswal for Appellant is present and all defects are reconciled.
Delay Condonation Application bearing I A no. 311/2023 is filed.
List this case before Hon’ble Chairperson on 25.04.2023 for Admission.
Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Mukesh Jaiswal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 091090002682023
- Bench
- LD Registrar
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court