Bank of Baroda v. Mahalingam
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal rejected for default due to non-appearance of appellant; incidental application for delay in representation dismissed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 3/2020 In A.IR:314/2019
Bank Of Baroda Vs C.Mahalingam
29/08/2023
No representation for petitioner/appellant.
This matter is posted today for dismissal as petitioner/appellant was absent on previous hearing i.e., 10.7.2023.
To give an opportunity to petitioner/appellant, matter is posted to this day under caption “for dismissal”. In spite of that, petitioner/appellant evinced no interest in prosecuting the application.
Therefore, application IA 3/2020 (Delay in representation) is dismissed for default. Consequently, Appeal AIR 314/2019 is rejected.
Sd/-
Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank Of Baroda
- respondent
C.Mahalingam
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 331090003142019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court