Bank of Baroda v. Ashish Vitthalrao Kalambe
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A/e> ■ A3
Contd Sheet
__
| . Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar's order/ Chairperson’s Orders |
|
|---|---|---|
| A2> | Jm9- _/3cmL (tyhe-ei , rtk- NG'U/Yk*? A" a^iU^ i ' _, » Xdo,/^ , |
|
| Sf]\oyl^Sf^ | de/e^ /o e^e i . /o' JJl0? |
■f > I |
| 2.5/08J2C23 031101'20'23 |
o(CdeVcechs- R> )T-/I W20'2-3- 'ZTl C • fVzr rvno-voj cJe^eote /O I ;^o2 c,. x^HoJ 'Tornb^ WPol lanb- * .TNovA’e < A P'PP^ +a’ wn e opdeF€C^ ~TI c ■-■ Mone boW. PecAA 037)0/20^ paj (5emo^ cd ot2 defects +t> r>C rNor>e Pott boVK Pa^^'eS- ftjj, P2r^o^<d c.. _ / •St-Si- |
I e * - >: :1 < J i_1_ cer |
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI
Mlsc Application No. of 20
in I. No.
Appeal No. Sh^_of20213
'
... Appellants
(Advocate 4^- Vm
Versus
Respondents
(Advocate.
)
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrars order I Chairperson’* Orders.
by /^Z^- fV 4^' FvIccKa
Appeal presented
Advocate for Appellant with D.D.-/ IPO ■ -of Rs. o11
being aggrieved by the impugned order / ^rartTorder
passed on > e - 2^ in S.A. /.QJ^No.33/ of
by DRT,— u/s 20 of R.D.D.D.& FTAi,l-f993 / 18 of
S.A.R.F.A.E'S.I. Act. 2002.
Exh-1 Appeal Memo
S.O. for compliance to 2.0 2^^
REGISTRAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 271090005462023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court