Authorised, Officer, Bombay Mercantile Co-operative Bank Limited v. Messrs. Sugaonkar Graphics Flex Printing

<	r ; .. ,.i ■ ■■ ■ .1 ;r.- ■ ■ !
$	A ._______________________ _... • • -•■ <■ ■ ■ :. '• s.iepjo B.udsjedjiBkid / jopjo e‘jB4isiddy’pae ■ - - !•	eieb

asiite

':''7"'WbWs “'■

P^BIg-BESOV^BYAPPEU^^ MUMBAI

Mtec Appllontlon No,. of 20 -
In Ur-NtC
.-Appoab
J^a/
.. :p//)/
... Appellants
(Advocate.
J
Versus .
M/^. cS’uso^^ R(ax

(Advocate
J
Data Office Notes, Appearances I mftHRUt TOVBW
and Registrar^ order / Chalrperson'o Ordoro
Isho^juj X.
Appeal presented .. by_ ZT~ A? 7~^po^vu4________ ,
ovi^vxQ.
Advocate for Ajypellanl with &Dr-Hfe) of Rs. on
j ^--Y^^^elng aggrieved by the InipugnecJ, order / RnsTordor
pgwwt on ^->|’rr)l9-oa-^ In SATe^No^^fof ^^3
hr DRT' u/a 20 of R.D.D.D.8,1- I Aol 1003 ./ IB of
S.A.R.F.A.e'.'S.I. Act. 2002.
Exh - -I Appeal Memo
S.O. lor compliance Io ?///fe
REGISTRAR
'7G/n/'20/X3 OJorxe Pott boVh A
Pdtt fOemO'yciJ of 'W IQ/o I
"■■\V
T

ivr.o.