Anil Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The tribunal dismissed an appeal as time-barred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. No counsel appeared for the appellant.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as time barred.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 512 of 2022
(Arising out of SA No. 11 of 2020 in DRT-Siliguri)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
05.07.2023
Anil Kumar Gupta & ors ... Appellants -VsUnion Bank of India & ors& 2 ors ... Respondent None for the Appellant Mr. Soumadip Saha, Learned Counsel Mr. Utpal Saha, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list. None is present for the Appellant. Learned Counsel for the Respondent is present. I.A. No. 345 of 2022 Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act which is on record. Accordingly, Appeal is also dismissed being time barred.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to the Appellant and the Respondent and the copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anil Kumar Gupta & ors
- respondent
Union Bank of India & ors
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court