Abdul Vahab Son of Kunju Mohammed v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order regarding non-compliance of office objections and status update by the appellant in a debt recovery appeal. The urgent petition was closed due to delay.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:1192/2023
Abdul Vahab V/S South Indian Bank
25/09/2023
Representing counsel Ms. Poornima for Appellant present.
None of the office objections are complied yet.
It is noted that Appellant has filed case before Hon’ble High Court of Kerala vide OP(DRT) No.341/2023.
Appellant counsel advised to submit status of the above case to the Registry on priority . Since urgent petition is not complied within a stipulated time period hence urgent petition is closed.
Office objections to be complied by 27/09/2023.
Call on 03/10/2023 for compliance.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Abdul Vahab
- respondent
South Indian Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 331090011922023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court