Vivek Dubey v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge, acting as Chairperson, no-shows the appeal to record a reply from the respondent-Bank's counsel, which is to be submitted within a week, before listing the matter for future hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 74/2021 Date: 22.12.2022
M/s Anushka Palace & Ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda
Present: Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellants, Shri Avinash Jaiswal, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that his reply is under preparation and shall be filed within a week. Let the same be filed within the time as prayed for.
The report of the Tehsildar dated 24.08.2021 is stated to have been received by post, wherein it is stated that he has not delivered the possession of the property in question to the auction purchaser.
List this case for reply on 31.03.2023.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Anushka Palace & Ors.
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court