Vinline Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal received an application under Section 20 of the RDBB Act, 1993 filed on behalf of Vinline Engineering Pvt Ltd against notices issued under SARFAESI Act. The Tribunal identified procedural defects including failure to mention the impugned order, lack of authentication, and submission of a delay petition, posting the matter for removal of defects.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. /712/2022 Date: 20/12/2022
Vinline Engineering Pvt Ltd & Ors. Appellant
Versus
HDFC Bank & Anr. Respondents
Received an application under Section 20 of Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 (51 of 1993) presented by Ld. Advocate, Ms. Shubhranshu Trivedi.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Vinline Engineering Pvt Ltd & Ors. against the notices dated 18.04.2022 issued under section 13(2) of Act of 2002 and possession notice dated 22.06.2022.
Application fees of Rs.205/- vide T.R. No.116494 dt. 20.12.2022 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
List of defects identified in an appeal filed under Section 20 of the RDBB Act, 1993.
Requirement of Late Petition before hearing on jurisdiction and limitation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vinline Engineering Pvt Ltd & Ors.
- respondent
HDFC Bank & Anr.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 191090007122022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court