The Transfer Petition was dismissed because the office of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, which was the target of the transfer application, had become vacant (demitted office), rendering the transfer infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Transfer Petition No. 04 of 2021)
(Arising out of S.A. 336 of 2019 in DRT-1 Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
29.08.2022
Sri Ravichandra Granite Industries
… Appellant
-Vs-
Canara Bank
… Respondent
Mr. N. Srinivas, learned counsel for the Appellant. None for the respondent bank.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Since Presiding Office has demitted the office of DRT, application for transferring the case to that DRT has become infructuous. Accordingly, present application is dismissed.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 29th August, 2022 16/pkb
Sri Ravichandra Granite Industries
Canara Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
