Dismissed
Sri Sriram Sabarees Saravanan v. Karur Vysya Bank
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appeal was declined under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 due to non-compliance of pending office objections.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
A.IR:305/2022
¶3
Sri Sriram Sabarees Saravanan V/S A.O.,Karur Vysya Bank Ltd & Ors
¶4
20/12/2022
¶5
None for Appellant.
¶6
Many of the office objections are still pending for compliance despite considerable time and opportunity given.
¶7
Hence Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994, as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
¶8
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sri Sriram Sabarees Saravanan
- respondent
A.O., Karur Vysya Bank Ltd & Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 331090003052022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court