Smt Prabha Kumari v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a procedural order where the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal noted defects in an application filed by the appellant and issued a 15-day notice to rectify them, including incorrect dates/case numbers in the relief sought and missing advocate appointment details in the vakalatnama.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.325/2021; Date : 28/04/2022
Smt. Prabha Kumari.………...Appellant
Vs.
Bank of Baroda & anr.……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Singh.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Smt. Prabha Kumari against the order dt.19.01.2021 in SA/74/2020 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT, Cuttack. Application fees of Rs.2,155/- vide T.R. no.115048 dt. 07.04.2021 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Singh.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not well within the period of Limitation but petition for condonation of delay is filed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Prabha Kumari
- respondent
Bank of Baroda & anr.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court