Shri Vaibhav Vasant Bodkhe v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal for default as the appellant failed to cure defects pointed out by the registry after a restoration to file. The appellant did not appear to plead.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of Misc. Appeal on Dairy No. 138/2021 for default and dismissal of miscellaneous applications as infructuous.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Misc. Appeal on Dairy No. 138/2021
Between
Vaibhav S/o VasantBodkhe … Appellant/s V/s. State Bank of India …Respondent/s
-: Order dated: 15/07/2022:-
There is no representation for the Appellant.
The Appeal was restored to file with a direction to cure the defects which are pointed out by the Registry within the stipulated time. The defects have not been cured and the report to that effect has been placed before the Tribunal by the Registry.
I assume that the Applicant is not keen on proceeding with the matter.
Hence, the Appeal on Diary stands dismissed for default.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-14
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vaibhav S/o Vasant Bodkhe
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 271090001382021
- Bench
- Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court