Shanthi v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai listed the matter for procedural disposition. A vakalath was filed on behalf of the first respondent Bank, while other respondents were found absent or service was rejected. Directions were issued for substituted service of notice to certain respondents.
What did the court decide?
Appellant directed to file affidavit of substituted service for R2 and R5 and serve complete documents to R1 within one week.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 642 /2021 In A.IR:191/2021
Shanthi V/S A.O.,Punjab National Bank & Ors
24/08/2022
Appellant’s counsel present.
Files Proof of Service.
R1- served.
R-2 returned Door Locked.
R3 –Served.
R4- served.
R5- returned as left.
Ld. Counsel M. L. Ganesh files Vakalath for R1 Bank .
R3 & R4 called absent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shanthi
- respondent
A.O., Punjab National Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court