Shalini Santosh Pardeshi v. Encore Asset Reconstruction company Pvt. Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD
Misc Applcation No. .
n of 20 , MUMBA
EBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNA L MUMBAI
Appeal No.
D 9A of 2022 . No.
M. Shaint Satosh rdasi
Appellants
Versus
Encose Ass fecosf. Co f 21D. 4 .Respondents
(Advocate
Date
Office Notes, Appearances
9|.02
and Reglstrar s order/ Chalrperson's Orders
Appeal
presented by 5 K.S. rdoei
265/20M Advocate for Appellant being aggrieved with B6HPO by the impugned of Rs. 250 order /a order on
passed on
-
in S.A. A. No 2 of 202
by DRT 1e
u/s 20of R.D.DB-&ELAc 4993 18 of
S.A.R.F.A.E.S.I. Act. 2002
Exh 1
Appeal Memo
SO. for compliance to /10/22
REGISTRAR
Nore ese) t*y te tàeis.
oPr Remaud o celesds to 1/n/2e
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sri. P.w.gorakh
- Order 2 · Sri. P.w.gorakh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court