M/ S Shagun Handicrafts and Others v. Canara Bank and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This interim order notes the filing of an appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act by M/s Shagun Handicrafts against a DRT order. It lists the case for admission before the Chairperson on the next date. The court records that no pre-deposit has been made but the waiver application was filed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 426 of 2022
(M/s Shagun Handicrafts and Ors. Vs. Canara Bank)
Date: 26.07.2022
Shri V.K. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present and provides D.D. No. 180257 dated 26.07.2022 (Punjab National Bank) of Rs 5,950/- (Rupees Five Thousands Nine Hundred Fifty Only) towards deficient court fee. As regards certified copy Ld. Counsel states that certified copy is coming by Dak and undertakes that he will file the same. Downloaded copy filed with the Appeal.
No pre deposit has been made. Waiver Application has been filed. Property sold by Bank for Rs. 23.30 lacs. Ld. Counsel states that he will argue this point before Hon’ble Court.
The instant Appeal is filed under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against final order dated 04.07.2022 of DRT, Dehradun in S. A. No. 138 of 2022. Waiver Application filed with the Appeal. Urgency Application (I.A. No. 245/2022) and Stay Application (I.A. No. 246/2022) have been filed.
List this case before Hon’ble Chairperson on 28.07.2022 for admission.
Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Shagun Handicrafts and Ors.
- respondent
Canara Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090004262022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court