Sai Nath Estates Private Limited v. Syndicate Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
An application was filed by the appellant to recall an order in Appeal no.148/2017. The tribunal noted procedural defects including missing enclosures and improper marking of annexures, issuing directions for their removal within 15 days.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Miscellaneous Application Diary no.630/2022; Date:15.11.2022
(arising out of Appeal no.148 of 2017)
M/s. Sainath Estate Private Limited .………...Appellant
Vs.
Syndicate Bank.….Respondents
Received an application under section 22(2) of the Recovery of Debt Due to Bank and Financial Act, 1993 presented by Ld. Advocate, Ms. Debaleena Ganguly.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of M/s. Sainath Estate Private Limited for setting aside/recalling the order dt. 26.09.2022 passed by the Hon’ble Chairperson and restoring in Appeal no.148/2017.
Application fees of Rs.200/- vide T.R. no.116376 dt. 15.11.2022 has been paid along with the application.
The Application is not filed within the period of Limitation but a delay petition (numbered as IA420/2022) is also filed with requisite fees of Rs. 200/- .
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the defects in the application under section 22(2) of the RDBFA should be removed before disposal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Sainath Estate Private Limited
- respondent
Syndicate Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 191090006302022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court