Disposed
Col.(Retd). K.S. Malik v. New Bank of India and 8 others
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/93/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Listed for service by publication; time granted for reply.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 56/2021 In Regular Appeal No. 93/2015 Date: 28.11.2022
Col. (retd.) K.S. Malik Vs. New Bank of India & Ors.
Present: Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri A. P. Singh, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Shri Sudeep Kumar Singh, Advocate files his vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent no. 9, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2-Bank seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
The office report dated 25.11.2022 shows that no one has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 to 7 and as per tracking report, the notices sent to the respondents no. 3 to 7 have returned back with endorsement “insufficient address”.
Let the appellant take steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the respondent nos. 3 to 7 by publication in the newspapers having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case on 13.03.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Col. (retd.) K.S. Malik
New Bank of India & Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court