Punjab and Sind Bank v. Ms Raghav Filling Station and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.92/2022 Arising out of S.A.No.202/2022(DRT-I, Delhi)
Punjab & Sind Bank Vs
M/s Raghav Filling Station & Ors.
01.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Ms. Seema Gupta, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Mr. Shashank Sharma proxy for Mr. Vinod Kumar, Ld. Counsel for respondents no.1 to 5.
Mr. Anand Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for respondents no. 6 to 9.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
The proxy counsel for respondents no.1 to 5 seeks time to file reply as the main counsel is not well. Reply be filed within 07 days.
The Ld. Counsel for respondents no. 6 to 9 states that they are auction purchasers in the present matter and are only interested in getting their money back. Ld. Counsel for appellant bank strongly opposes the same and submits that this appeal may be decided first and whatever order is passed by this Tribunal, the bank will abide by the same.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Punjab & Sind Bank
- respondent
M/s Raghav Filling Station & Ors.
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court