Request for extension of time to obtain instructions; no representation for respondent; matter post-poned.
Delay for obtaining instructions was granted to the appellant; hearing was adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 91/2016
Between
State Bank of India … Appellant/s V/s. Ravindra Sureshchandra Agrawal …Respondent/s Mr. Dileep S. Paranjape, Advocate for Appellant.
The learned counsel for the Appellant seeks some more time for getting instructions.
There is no representation for Respondents.
Post on 20.07.2022 for hearing.
Chairperson
dpj-27
1
State Bank of India
Ravindra Sureshchandra Agrawal
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
