Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. v. Shakti Constructions
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant bank sought an adjournment due to counsel's unavailability caused by the COVID-19 situation. The hearing was postponed for August 2, 2022.
The appellant bank sought an adjournment due to counsel's unavailability caused by the COVID-19 situation. The hearing was postponed for August 2, 2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 85/2013
Between Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. M/s. Shakti Constructions …Respondent/s Mr. Ajay Goswami, i/b M/s. Goenka Law, Advocate for Appellant. -: Order dated : 20/06/2022 :-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant Bank has been laid up and indisposed because of Covid and hence seeks adjournment.
Post on 02.08.2022 for ex-parte hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-19
1
Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd.
M/s. Shakti Constructions
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court