The Delhi Rent Control Tribunal adjourned the hearing to February 16, 2023, as the respondent's counsel was out of station and a recall application remained pending without reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 30/2020 In Regular Appeal No. 79/2016 Date: 25.11.2022
Abhishek Tomer Vs. M/s Shankar Rice Products & Ors.
Present: Shri Mohit Kumar, counsel for the appellant, Shri Satish Kumar Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri M. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondents,
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the arguing counsel Shri M. K. Srivastava is out of station, therefore, he is unable to attend this Tribunal today and he prays for adjournment.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the recall application is pending since long, but no reply has been filed. Let the reply be filed by the next date, if so desired.
List this case on 16.02.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Abhishek Tomer
M/s Shankar Rice Products & Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
