This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 46/2010
Between
Federal Bank Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Preet Sonal Investment & Finance Pvt. Ltd. & …Respondent/s Ors. Ms. Ashmita Mourya, i/b Mr. Vivek Sawant, Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Priynka, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 to 13. Mr. Parag Kale, Advocate for the Respondent No. 14. And
Appeal No. 78/2005
Between The City and Industrial Development … Appellant/s Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. V/s. Federal Bank Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr. Parag Kale, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Ashmita Mourya, i/b Mr. Vivek Sawant, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Ms. Priyanka, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 to 12 And
Appeal No. 126/2005 Between The City and Industrial Development … Appellant/s Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. V/s. Federal Bank Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr. Parag Kale, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Ashmita Mourya, i/b Mr. Vivek Sawant, Advocate for the Respondent No.1.
Ms. Priyanka, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 to 12
-: Order dated : 25/05/2022 :-
Today, all three matters are posted for hearing.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Bank is not ready for hearing and seeks adjournment. Being the matters are of 2005 and 2010 and the matters were especially posted for hearing.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for other side is ready for hearing. Hence, adjournment granted subject to the payment of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) to counsel for the CIDCO.
Post on 23.06.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-3, 8 & 9
Federal Bank Ltd.
Preet Sonal Investment & Finance Pvt. Ltd.
Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court