Daitarai Moharana v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appearing respondent side; appellant absent. Later list adjourned to 17/11/2022 at Cuttack camp court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL: KOLKATA CAMP COURT AT DRT, CUTTACK Diary No.145 of 2021
(Arising out of MA No.95 of 2020 in SA No.76 of 2019 in DRT-Cuttack) THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.09.2022
Daitari Moharana …. Appellant -Vrs.The UCO Bank & Others …. Respondents None for the Appellant Mr. M. B. K. Rao, Learned Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
None for the appellant. Learned Counsel Shri M. B. K. Rao for the Respondent No.1 to 3 present. Although service is sufficient on the Respondents No.4 and 5 but today none has appeared for them.
Matter is taken up today in the Camp Court. Since none has appeared for the appellant, list this matter on 17/11/2022 already fixed.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated:6th September, 2022
Daitari Moharana
The UCO Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court