Sandeep Kabra and Anr. v. Uco Bank and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listed for hearing. Appellants informed they would not file a rejoinder. Respondent No. 1 will not file an opposition. Oppns filed by Respondent No. 2 taken on record.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No.73 of 2018)
(Arising out of S.A. 363 of 2015 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.072022 Sandeep Kabra & Another … Appellants -vsUCO Bank & Others … Respondents Mr. Nemani Srinivas with Ms. Kasturi Dasgupta, Learned Counsel for Appellants
Mr. S. N. Patra Bhatta, Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1/UCO Bank
Mr. Prasenjit Pal, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Mr. Prasenjit Pal, Learned Counsel, appears for Respondent No. 2 by filing Vakalatnama; taken on record.
Name of Mr. Presenjit Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2, be printed in the cause list.
Opposition filed by Respondent No. 2 is taken on record.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sandeep Kabra & Another
- respondent
UCO Bank & Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court