In this default hearing of an appeal arising out of S.A. 96 of 2011, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal as no representative of the appellant was present on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
( Appl No. 73 of 2013)
(Arising out of S. A. 96 of 2011 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
24.08.2022 Radhika Silk Mills Private Limited & 2 ors … Appellant -VsState Bank of Hyderabad & Anr. ….Respondent None for the Appellant Ms. Mekhala Kanji, Learned Counsel for the Respondent Mr. D. Basu Roy, Learned Counsel, Ms. Sarmistha Poddar, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 2.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up. None is present for the
Appellants. Learned Counsel for the Respondents are present. Appeal is dismissed in default.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 24th August, 2022 15/tp
RADHIKA SILK MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED & 2 ORS.
STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD & ANR
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
