The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for ex-parte hearing as respondents, served only by publication, did not appear. No substantive decision was recorded in the text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No.71/2022
Between
Punjab National Bank … Appellant/s V/s.
Basil Resource Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Fraser M. Alexander, i/b M/s. Majmudar & Partners, Advocate for Appellant.
Notice was served on the Respondents by way of publication but none appeared in the application for the condonation of delay. The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant, therefore, seeks dispensation notice afresh on the Appeal which is at lodging No. 561/2017.
In view of the facts that despite notice being served by way of the publication none of the Respondents appeared, they are called absent and set ex-parte.
Post on 16.01.2023 for ex-parte hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
psa 13
1
Punjab National Bank
Basil Resource Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
