Kotak Mahindra Bank and Ors. v. Deccan Chronicles Holdings Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order concerns procedural steps in a debt recovery appeal due to the death of a respondent. The court directed that substitution proceedings be initiated and fixed the matter for hearing of such application.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 70 of 2016)
(Arising out of S.A. 219 of 2014 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 11.08.2022 | Authorised Officer, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited & Another … Appellants -Vs- |
|---|---|
| Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited & 2 Others … Respondents |
|
| Mr. Jayabrata Basu Ray with Mr. Ramanuj Roy Chgowdhuri, Learned Counsel for Appellants |
|
| Mr. Himanshu Bhawsingha, Learned Counsel for Proforma Respondent No. 3 |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2 informs that Respondent No. 3, Sabban Hari, expired.
Let steps for substitution be taken. Details of legal heirs of the deceased Respondent be provided to the Learned Counsel for Appellant who shall move appropriate application within two weeks.
List on 16th November, 2022 for hearing of the substitution application.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited & Another
- respondent
Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited & 2 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court