Linen Art Private Limited v. Catalyst Trusteeship Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD
Mlsc Applcatlon No.
DEBTS In RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Mlsc Applcatlon No.
In of 20
L No.
Appeal No.55of 2022
Ms. iuem t
Pyt D
Appellants
Adrocate YK0 &Asao CIoPS
Versus
CalystTusfeebhrp D os Respondents
dvocate.
Date
Office Notes, Appearances
S5122 and Reglstrar's order / Chalrperson's Orders
Appeal presented
on
Advocate for Appellant with D-DHPO of Rs. So
g-0
9L peing aggrieved by the impugned order final order
passed on O9-02-2022in S.A. IOA No.202of 202
by DRT- faw@
u/s 20-ef-RDDB-&FAct t995| 18 of
S.A.R.F.A.E.S.I. Act. 2002.
Exh 1 Appeal Memo
s.0. for compliance to ola/2n
REGISTRAR
3.b Nere
emouul of detas hs l8stho
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court