An appeal was dismissed as not entertainable due to the appellant's non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition. No arguments were heard as the applicant was absent.
Appeal dismissed for want of compliance with the condition of pre-deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.63/2021 Arising out of S.A.No.130/2019(DRT, Jaipur)
Kuldeep Sankhla Vs Bank of Baroda & Ors.
20.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None for appellant.
Mr. Bhaskar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondents no.1 and 2.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. Vide order dated
21.10.2021 it was made clear that if the pre-deposit is not made the appeal will be dismissed as not entertainable. This direction has not been complied with.
Appeal is therefore, dismissed as not entertainable for want of compliance
of the condition of pre-deposit.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Kuldeep Sankhla
Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
